In 2026, after nearly 90 years, the Institute of Design was folded into Illinois Tech's School of Design & Society.
This website is an archive of the impactful and inspirational work produced by the ID community before that transition.

László Moholy-Nagy opened the New Bauhaus in Chicago in 1937, treating design as a discipline that was teachable, testable, and consequential. Nine decades on, its scope had widened from the things people use to the systems they depend on: hospitals, government agencies, classrooms, supply chains, digital platforms. Along the way, ID community members developed the published research, methods, and frameworks that designers rely on every day.

Chief among them is human-centered design: close attention to how people actually live, and advocacy for what that research reveals. It shaped designers who are comfortable with complexity and ambiguity: curious, rigorous, inclusive, and stubbornly optimistic about design's ability to change the systems that shape our lives.

To every one of them, who taught, studied, built, critiqued, and stayed late in the studio: thank you, and keep designing.

Skip to Main Content
institute
of desiGn
Search

Laura Forlano on Futuring

At Public Books, a discussion on how to future and the business of futuring

By Kristin Gecan

October 20, 2021

Futuring background
Laura Forlano

Laura Forlano

In an article published at Public Books, “The Future is Not a a Solution,” ID associate professor Laura Forlano discusses three recent books: Devon Powers’s On Trend: The Business of Forecasting the Future, Scott Smith’s How to Future: Leading and Sense-Making in an Age of Hyperchange, and Rose Eveleth’s Flash Forward: An Illustrated Guide to Possible (and Not So Possible) Tomorrows.

She also reflects on how we future at ID:

“In my research and teaching over the past 10 years at the IIT Institute of Design, my students, my collaborators, and I have used experimental approaches, such as games, events, participatory workshops, role-playing, props, images, and videos to critique and destabilize “official futures,” particularly, the techno-optimistic claims of perfection that are regularly issued by Silicon Valley firms. In imagining what might go wrong and the social consequences of technology, we explore future frictions, rather than science fiction.

In my Designing Futures course, we explore the kinds of approaches—forecasting, scenarios, and speculation—described above. But we spend just as much time discussing the kinds of futures that are worthwhile, ethical, equitable, and just with grounding in both academic, artistic, and activist visions for futures.”

Forlano rejects the idea that the future exists beyond or outside of ourselves. Instead, she writes, we need to sustain “a deep and reflexive engagement in sociological and anthropological understandings of the consequences of design and technology.” Through these processes, we are quite simply “getting to know ourselves better,” and understanding: “What kinds of worlds are we truly committed to building?”

Read the full article at Public Books and join today’s free online event, What Should We Make?, a panel discussion on this same topic.