In 2026, after nearly 90 years, the Institute of Design was folded into Illinois Tech's School of Design & Society.
This website is an archive of the impactful and inspirational work produced by the ID community before that transition.

László Moholy-Nagy opened the New Bauhaus in Chicago in 1937, treating design as a discipline that was teachable, testable, and consequential. Nine decades on, its scope had widened from the things people use to the systems they depend on: hospitals, government agencies, classrooms, supply chains, digital platforms. Along the way, ID community members developed the published research, methods, and frameworks that designers rely on every day.

Chief among them is human-centered design: close attention to how people actually live, and advocacy for what that research reveals. It shaped designers who are comfortable with complexity and ambiguity: curious, rigorous, inclusive, and stubbornly optimistic about design's ability to change the systems that shape our lives.

To every one of them, who taught, studied, built, critiqued, and stayed late in the studio: thank you, and keep designing.

Skip to Main Content
institute
of desiGn
Search

AskChuck: Making Design Methodology Accessible Through AI

February 26, 2026

Image of Steelcase Ocular View from Anurag Duddu
Preserving Charles Owen's Four Decades of Systems Thinking for New Generations of Designers

Summary

Charles L. Owen spent four decades at the Institute of Design developing rigorous methods for systems thinking—frameworks that remain surprisingly relevant as designers navigate today’s complex challenges. When Owen passed in 2019, his complete published work moved into institutional archives, accessible primarily to those who already knew what to look for.

Anurag Duddu (MDes 2025) recognized an opportunity: emerging AI technologies could make Owen’s methodology conversational and accessible to designers who never sat in his classroom. AskChuck uses retrieval-augmented generation to transform Owen’s 20 academic papers, 176 pages of frameworks, and 70+ original diagrams into a queryable learning system—one that returns exact citations and preserves the methodological precision that generic AI cannot supply.

The platform, available at askchuck.web.app, demonstrates how specialized design knowledge can remain educationally alive for new generations while maintaining its valuable rigor.

AskChuck: Access to Decades of Design Expertise

Charles Owen built his methodology before “design thinking” entered the boardroom. His work was precise where the field preferred poetry—he named things designers had always done but never codified. The Design Factor. The Abstraction Ladder. The Information Structure. These weren’t metaphors; they were repeatable processes tested across decades of student work and real projects.

His frameworks survived at ID, passed down through studio culture and the students he trained. But the person who could explain them, contextualize them, and adapt them to new questions was gone. AskChuck now makes Owen’s teaching and methods accessible to new generations.

OPPORTUNITY

20
20 Papers: Owen's Complete Published Record, Now Processed and Queryable
176
176 Pages of Methodology, Case Studies, and Frameworks Made Accessible
70+
Original Diagrams Returned With Explanations
40+
40+ Years of Systems Thinking Methods Now Available 24/7

What Gets Lost with Generic AI?

Generic large language models can discuss systems thinking competently. They’ll cover familiar territory—design thinking frameworks, wicked problems, established methodologies. But they won’t produce Owen’s Structured Planning. They won’t explain the VTCON clustering process or distinguish between Function Structures and Information Structures.

This isn’t a capability problem. Owen’s work circulated through academic channels and ID’s studio culture, never achieving the mainstream visibility his influence deserved. A language model trained on internet-scale text reflects what’s widely published. For specialized methodologies like Owen’s, that means important knowledge remains effectively invisible.

AskChuck addresses this gap by creating a dedicated system grounded entirely in Owen’s actual work—preserving an authority who never reached the mainstream.

VIDEO

Introducing AskChuck

AskChuck makes Charles Owen’s four decades of systems thinking methodology queryable through AI, preserving precision that generic language models cannot supply. Here, Anurag Duddu (MDes 2025) explains how it works.

Prototyping to Learn: Building Through Iteration

Anurag’s approach centered on rapid prototyping and learning through building. Rather than following a prescribed process, he prioritized iteration speed—the goal of design is to iterate, and the sooner you can iterate, the faster you learn.

The project began with a question: what happens to specialized knowledge when the person who developed it is no longer here to teach it?

PROCESS

My master's research at ID has examined what remains irreducibly human in creative work as AI capabilities expand. AskChuck is my attempt to answer that question by building, not only theorizing: to understand what AI can faithfully preserve and extend, and what it cannot.
—Anurag Duddu (MDes 2025)

How Does AskChuck Use AI?

AskChuck is transparent about its AI dependency because that transparency is part of its educational integrity.

The system uses AI at every layer, and each use is deliberate:

Language models generate contextual descriptions for each chunk of Owen’s text, making implicit meaning explicit before embedding.

Vision models describe Owen’s original diagrams—flowcharts, hierarchies, worksheets—so users can retrieve and see them inline with explanations.

Embedding models convert both Owen’s corpus and user questions into vector representations, enabling retrieval by meaning rather than keyword matching.

A second AI layer scores retrieved passages for relevance before passing them to generation, reducing noise and improving precision.

A language model synthesizes retrieved context into coherent, terminologically precise responses that cite specific documents and reference original figures.

Speech recognition, natural language understanding, and voice synthesis enable real-time spoken dialogue grounded entirely in Owen’s content.

AskChuck virtual assistant shares knowledge via the Steelcase Ocular View

An AI assistant presents Charles Owen's teaching and methods through the Steelcase Ocular View.

A Distinct Learning Assistant

The system also acknowledges clear boundaries. AI cannot recover what Owen said in studio and never wrote down. It cannot reconstruct whiteboard diagrams that lived only in classrooms. It cannot replicate the judgment of a teacher who spent four decades watching students struggle with concepts in different ways.

The avatar is not Owen. Simulating a deceased person raises important ethical questions. Instead, the assistant is a new character: an ID learning guide whose entire knowledge base comes from Owen’s work. Drawing on immersive spatial display research from Steelcase’s Ocular View work, students can interact through speech in real time, serving different learning styles.

OUTCOME

Precision That Generic AI Can't Match

The difference becomes clear through specific examples. Ask a generic AI “How do I turn user insights into design directions?” and you’ll get valid answers about affinity mapping and opportunity framing—broad field knowledge.

AskChuck provides Owen’s specific approach: the Design Factor structure with its four components (Observation, Extension, Design Implications, Speculations), complete with the original worksheet diagram and citation to where Owen demonstrated this process. The response uses Owen’s exact vocabulary and preserves the procedural sequence that makes the method work.

Methods work because their structure is precise. AskChuck maintains that precision by staying grounded in Owen’s actual published work.

AskChuck web interface

The web interface of AskChuck, askchuck.web.app, makes Charles Owen's teaching and methods available beyond the Steelcase Ocular View.

Chuck Owen

Charles (Chuck) Owen teaching his last class, circa 2010.

Owen’s Frameworks Remain Accessible

The system makes Owen’s key methodologies queryable:

  • Structured Planning: Systematic process from problem framing through solution generation with defined phases
  • Function Structures: Top-down decomposition organized into Modes, Activities, and Functions
  • Design Factors: Four-part instrument for turning observation into design direction
  • Information Structures: Bottom-up clustering revealing which design problems can be solved together
  • Abstraction Ladders: Tool for moving up and down levels of generality to find fresh solution territory

Each framework maintains Owen’s precise terminology and procedural logic.

IMPACT

A Knowledge Infrastructure for Design Education

Owen’s influence extended beyond his 20 published papers—decades of student work applied his frameworks to transportation systems, medical devices, urban infrastructure, and communication tools. That applied methodology represents ID’s living intellectual history.

AskChuck is built to grow beyond its initial corpus. The same pipeline that processed Owen’s papers can process student projects, faculty research, and unpublished working papers. The vision extends from preserving one professor’s legacy toward building comprehensive knowledge infrastructure for ID’s intellectual history.

The legacy of Chuck Owen has always been about bridging structure and creativity. With this tool, we are ensuring that his brilliance continues to guide and inspire future innovators.
—Anurag Duddu (MDes 2025)

Why Does Structuring Problems Correctly Matter?

As AI accelerates solution generation, the ability to structure problems correctly becomes more valuable. Owen spent four decades building remarkably rigorous approaches to problem structuring. Making that work accessible to designers practicing today means specialized expertise remains available at scale without losing the precision that makes it educational.

This isn’t about replacing design education—it’s about extending it. A retrieval system can’t replicate a teacher’s judgment developed over decades of watching students learn. But it can make what great teachers captured available in forms that serve new learners in new ways.

The approach demonstrates broader possibilities: specialized, domain-specific expertise can be preserved and made accessible through thoughtful application of AI technologies, maintaining educational value while acknowledging real limitations.

TEAM

Students

Anurag Duddu (MDes 2025)

Partners

Peter Zapf (Director of Partnerships and Strategic Initiatives
Adjunct Professor)
Steelcase